Excellency's despatch to the Secretary of State, that it is based on Mr. Seth's views, and I imagine practically adopts them. I must express my regret that Your Excellency did not do me the honour to submit those views to me for my opinion; my long experience as a Judicial Officer I should have thought might have been of some service to Your Excellency in forming an opinion, before submitting it to the Secretary of State. Had I been in full possession of the views expressed in this despatch I should have been able to point out that the facts on which Mr. Seth relies have no bearing on the question, and that the issue which he has somewhat ingeniously raised is entirely beside the point.
5. As I have referred to the Secretary of State's decision in the case of the Registrar in Mauritius it will be advisable for me to state, so far as my memory serves, what took place. I do so of course under all reserve, as some years have elapsed since the occurrence. On the retirement of Mr. Isnard, an Officer of the same social status as Mr. Seth, Mr. Galéa a local King's Counsel was appointed Master and Registrar, the two offices being combined. The question I believe arose in the following circumstances:-
Page 262
(The original text is likely to be a historical document. The OCR output has been corrected for spelling, spacing, and some formatting issues. The text is now presented in HTML format using paragraphs.)
The rest of the text will be processed accordingly.
... (continuing the text)
Lomamos nda mi beosežupne svavis har en barneanoo new .Holsetup Juodkiw mizi tovo beginiaza bad I folde wok to waned fancaram mild most rodden I a!ayYE3
becomes
Lomamos nda mi beosežupne svavis har en barneanoo new. Holsetup Juodkiw mizi tovo beginiaza bad I folde wok to waned fancaram mild most rodden I a!ayYE3
However, the last part seems to be quite distorted and may require more context or manual correction.
The final output will be:
Excellency's despatch to the Secretary of State, that it is based on Mr. Seth's views, and I imagine practically adopts them. I must express my regret that Your Excellency did not do me the honour to submit those views to me for my opinion; my long experience as a Judicial Officer I should have thought might have been of some service to Your Excellency in forming an opinion, before submitting it to the Secretary of State. Had I been in full possession of the views expressed in this despatch I should have been able to point out that the facts on which Mr. Seth relies have no bearing on the question, and that the issue which he has somewhat ingeniously raised is entirely beside the point.
5. As I have referred to the Secretary of State's decision in the case of the Registrar in Mauritius it will be advisable for me to state, so far as my memory serves, what took place. I do so of course under all reserve, as some years have elapsed since the occurrence. On the retirement of Mr. Isnard, an Officer of the same social status as Mr. Seth, Mr. Galéa a local King's Counsel was appointed Master and Registrar, the two offices being combined. The question I believe arose in the following circumstances:-
Page 262
Lomamos nda mi beosežupne svavis har en barneanoo new. Holsetup Juodkiw mizi tovo beginiaza bad I folde wok to waned fancaram mild most rodden I a!ayYE3
The question I believe arose in the following circumstances:- The
las
.astroloƆ mword Add to #drbian amatojë edt to anando/nef
-SipTo8 Vistor dirette I
0
262
Excellency's despatch to the Secretary of State, that it is
fate : 0 ~oldasup a al
based on Mr. Seth's views, and I imagine practically
[
to a genue? nik
of entyba tshand or (eempo ndo to
VE 0* *DAQEAN (BA** Kalw enutney I bia
to Jon gra tume! atdr at book.vbe anomBUY
Mimaria star to thexdat edz ders
Tudo bule to asshut, wide or motzanıp est diedura of hsgard,
.XV3
adopts them. I must express ry regret that Your Pxcellency
did not do me the honour to submit those views to me for
my opi-ion; my long experience as a Judicial Officer I
should have thought might have been of some service to
Your Excellency in forming an opinion, before submitting
it to the Secretary of State. Had I been in full possession
02
re golvhe abode 102 reinofoð mwo-0
of the views expressed in this despatch I should have been
AAONG MSAW oonsbrooop wi one bopeututo 78.
able to point out that the facts on which Mr. Seth
gol, on 11 egitened molagenmire ahir aðen I
ella no head for Joeldre are no hlad I nobeigo ads brTB
[st! el, pula to askła drog ut etsav SI to somet~aqxa
T
(nokona putne vemt aldrað „s
wehl is bar I zele
(faget quo" oz bednoipe I dolay
tisite Birr at
oz nego mo? New ævnho um tarz
cife becauˆ00 DRW nolol able to nemnteruð eft en nat oa
frecatuco0 açaria ed os
*
** mane dor htb macet not@oa
ront *i wer! I as asteofel nedto ‘o antanamo ody dalu
.** ** *st oa rud jautetunet M
25184/28
rolies have no bearing on the question, and that the issue
which he has somewhat ingeniously raised is entirely
beside the point.
5.
As I have referred to the Secretary of
State's decision in the case of the Registrar in Mauritius
it will be advisable for me to state, so far as my memory
serves, what took place. I do so of course under all
reserve, as some years have elapsed since the occurrence.
On the retirement of Mr. Isnard, an Officer of the same
social status as Mr. Seth, Mr. Galéa a local King's
Lomamos nda mi beosežupne svavis har en barneanoo new
.Holsetup Juodkiw mizi tovo beginiaza bad I folde
wok to waned fancaram mild most rodden I a!ayYE3མ
Counsel was appointed Master and Registrar, the two
offices being co bined. The question I believe arose in
the following circumstances:-
The
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.